Bruce,
> Someone should ask them to remove the article.
"Someone".
Um, *who* taught for Big Nerd Ranch for several years, Bruce?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, ple
Josh Berkus wrote:
All,
The Bizgres project is working on resource management for PostgreSQL. So far,
however, they have been able to come up with schemes that work for BI/DW at
the expense of OLTP. Becuase of O^N lock checking issues, resource
management for OLTP which doesn't greatly redu
Someone should ask them to remove the article.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There is an article about "Lowering the priority of a PostgreSQL query"
> > (http://weblog.bignerdranch.
All,
The Bizgres project is working on resource management for PostgreSQL. So far,
however, they have been able to come up with schemes that work for BI/DW at
the expense of OLTP. Becuase of O^N lock checking issues, resource
management for OLTP which doesn't greatly reduce overall performanc
* Carlos H. Reimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061128 20:02]:
> Hi,
>
> There is an article about "Lowering the priority of a PostgreSQL query"
> (http://weblog.bignerdranch.com/?p=11) that explains how to use the
> setpriority() to lower PostgreSQL processes.
>
> I?m wondering how much effective it wou
"Carlos H. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is an article about "Lowering the priority of a PostgreSQL query"
> (http://weblog.bignerdranch.com/?p=11) that explains how to use the
> setpriority() to lower PostgreSQL processes.
> I?m wondering how much effective it would be for i/o bound
