Can we please trim this down to just advocacy?
On Jun 18, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 6/18/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing?
As a realist, I might ask, how many times do we have to answer th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Certainly, but can one expect to get a realistic answer to an, "is
> Oracle fearing something" question on he PostgreSQL list? Or was it
> just a backhanded attempt at pushing the topic again? My vote is for
> the latter; i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>
> All of us have noticed the anti-MySQL bashing based on problems with
> MySQL 3.23... Berkus and others (including yourself, if I am correct),
> have corrected people on not making invalid comparisons against
> ancient vers
On 6/18/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah funny how you didn't do that ;) (of course neither did I).
I agree, an oops on my part :)
It is amazing how completely misguided you are in this response. I
haven't said anything closed minded. I only responded to your rather
antagon
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 6/18/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Depends? How many times are you going to antagonize the people that ask?
As many times as necessary. Funny how the anti-proprietary-database
arguments can continue forever and no one brings up the traditional
RTFM-l
On 6/18/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Depends? How many times are you going to antagonize the people that ask?
As many times as necessary. Funny how the anti-proprietary-database
arguments can continue forever and no one brings up the traditional
RTFM-like response of, "hey, t
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 6/18/07, Andreas Kostyrka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a cynic, I might ask, what Oracle is fearing?
As a realist, I might ask, how many times do we have to answer this
type of anti-commercial-database flamewar-starting question?
Depends? How many times are you goi
