On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 12:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I agree its annoying and I have a way of doing this, but that's an 8.4
> > thing now.
>
> It was an 8.4 thing quite some time ago, since no working patch was ever
> submitted.
Sorry, I meant that the
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree its annoying and I have a way of doing this, but that's an 8.4
> thing now.
It was an 8.4 thing quite some time ago, since no working patch was ever
submitted.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 17:48 -0400, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Works great - plans no longer sort, but rather use indices as
> expected. It's in use in Greenplum now.
>
> It's a simple approach, should easily extend from gpdb to postgres.
> The patch is against gpdb so someone needs to 'port' it.
The
Original Message-
From: Simon Riggs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 05:34 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Luke Lonergan
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas; Anton; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field
