On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:45:34AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>
> >
> >More importantly, it allows the system to come up and do fsck in
> >the background. If you've got a large database that's a pretty big
> >benefit.
>
> That's a UFS2 feature,
On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
More importantly, it allows the system to come up and do fsck in
the background. If you've got a large database that's a pretty big
benefit.
That's a UFS2 feature, not a soft-updates feature.
---(end of broadcast)
On Apr 4, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I've always left them on, and never had any issues...(even after
unscheduled power loss - which happened here yesterday). As I
understand it, the softupdate code reorders *metadata* operations,
On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:10 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I've always left them on, and never had any issues...(even after
unscheduled power loss - which happened here yesterday). As I
understand it, the softupdate code reorders *metadata* operations,
and does not alter data operations - so the ef
Miguel wrote:
Hi, reading the archives i cant find a clear answer about softupdates in
freebsd, is it recommended to enable it for the data directory?
There is a pretty good article about softupdates and journelling here:
http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix2000/gene
