On 05.11.2012 16:32, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Dong Ye wrote:
You are using prepared statements, this makes me think that this
regression might be due to support for parameter specific plans for
prepared statements. [1] Can you run the test on both versions without
p
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Dong Ye wrote:
>> You are using prepared statements, this makes me think that this
>> regression might be due to support for parameter specific plans for
>> prepared statements. [1] Can you run the test on both versions without
>> prepared statements and see if the
> You are using prepared statements, this makes me think that this
> regression might be due to support for parameter specific plans for
> prepared statements. [1] Can you run the test on both versions without
> prepared statements and see if the regressions remains.
Without prepare statement, we
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Dong Ye wrote:
> The average notpm is 61384.24 with 9.1.6 and 57381.43 with 9.2.1.
> Plotting notps over time shows that the slowdown of 9.2.1 is evident across
> the entire run period.
> Since we also observed sustained 80+% CPU utilization during both runs, we
