On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 13:36, Greg Stumph wrote:
> Well, since I got no response at all to this message, I can only assume that
> I've asked the question in an insufficient way, or else that no one has
> anything to offer on our problem.
>
> This was my first post to the list, so if there's a bet
On 4/29/06, Greg Stumph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, since I got no response at all to this message, I can only assume that
I've asked the question in an insufficient way, or else that no one has
anything to offer on our problem.
This was my first post to the list, so if there's a better way
Usually when simple queries take a long time to run, it's the system
tables (pg_*) that have become bloated and need vacuuming. But that's
just random guess on my part w/o my detailed info.
Greg Stumph wrote:
Well, since I got no response at all to this message, I can only assume that
I've as
Well, since I got no response at all to this message, I can only assume that
I've asked the question in an insufficient way, or else that no one has
anything to offer on our problem.
This was my first post to the list, so if there's a better way I should be
asking this, or different data I shou
