Bill Moran wrote:
In response to "Sabin Coanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Bill,
...
However, you can get some measure of tracking my running VACUUM VERBOSE
on a regular basis to see how well autovacuum is keeping up. There's
no problem with running manual vacuum and autovacuum together, and yo
In response to "Sabin Coanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Bill,
>
> ...
> >
> > However, you can get some measure of tracking my running VACUUM VERBOSE
> > on a regular basis to see how well autovacuum is keeping up. There's
> > no problem with running manual vacuum and autovacuum together, and yo
Hi Bill,
...
>
> However, you can get some measure of tracking my running VACUUM VERBOSE
> on a regular basis to see how well autovacuum is keeping up. There's
> no problem with running manual vacuum and autovacuum together, and you'll
> be able to gather _some_ information about how well autovac
In response to "Sabin Coanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi there,
>
> Using explicitly VACUUM command give me the opportunity to fine tune my
> VACUUM scheduling parameters, after I analyze the log generated by VACUUM
> VERBOSE.
>
> On the other hand I'd like to use the auto-vacuum mechanism beca
Sabin Coanda wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Using explicitly VACUUM command give me the opportunity to fine tune my
> VACUUM scheduling parameters, after I analyze the log generated by VACUUM
> VERBOSE.
>
> On the other hand I'd like to use the auto-vacuum mechanism because of its
> facilities. Unfort
