On 05/12/2012 18:28, Shaun Thomas wrote:
Hey guys,
This isn't a question, but a kind of summary over a ton of investigation
I've been doing since a recent "upgrade". Anyone else out there with
"big iron" might want to confirm this, but it seems pretty reproducible.
This seems to affect the lates
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> This isn't a question, but a kind of summary over a ton of investigation
> I've been doing since a recent "upgrade". Anyone else out there with
> "big iron" might want to confirm this, but it seems pretty reproducible.
> This seems to affect t
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 04:41 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> Ah, that is interesting about 2.6. I had wondered how Debian stable
>> would have performed, 2.6.32-5. This relates to a recent discussion
>> about the appropriateness of Ubuntu for database s
On 12/05/2012 04:41 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Ah, that is interesting about 2.6. I had wondered how Debian stable
would have performed, 2.6.32-5. This relates to a recent discussion
about the appropriateness of Ubuntu for database servers:
Hmm. I may have to recant. I just removed our fusionI
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 04:25:28PM -0600, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 04:19 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
>
> >Is 3.2 a significant regression from previous releases, or is 3.4 just
> >faster? Your wording only indicates that "older kernel is slow," but
> >your tone would suggest that you feel
On 12/05/2012 04:19 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
Is 3.2 a significant regression from previous releases, or is 3.4 just
faster? Your wording only indicates that "older kernel is slow," but
your tone would suggest that you feel this is a regression, cf.
It's definitely a regression. I'm trying to
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> This isn't a question, but a kind of summary over a ton of investigation
> I've been doing since a recent "upgrade". Anyone else out there with
> "big iron" might want to confirm this, but it seems pretty reproducible.
> This see
Where as I can't say I yet tried out the 3.4 kernel, I can say that I am
running 3.2 too, and maybe there is a connection to the past issues of strange
CPU behavior I have had (as you know and have been so kind to try helping me
solve). I will without a doubt try out 3.4 or 3.6 within the coming
