On 08/24/2012 05:47 AM, Felix Schubert wrote:
Hello List,
I've got a system on a customers location which has a XEON E5504 @
2.00GHz Processor (HP Proliant)
It's postgres 8.4 on a Debian Squeeze System running with 8GB of ram:
The Postgres Performance on this system measured with pgbench is
No problem, hope it helps. The single most important part of any
fast, transactional server is the RAID controller and its cache.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Felix Schubert wrote:
> Don't know but I forwarded the question to the System Administrator.
>
> Anyhow thanks for the information up
Don't know but I forwarded the question to the System Administrator.
Anyhow thanks for the information up to now!
best regards,
Felix
Am 25.08.2012 um 14:59 schrieb Scott Marlowe :
> Well it sounds like it does NOT have a battery back caching module on
> it, am I right?
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Felix Schubert wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> the controller is a HP i410 running 3x300GB SAS 15K / Raid 5
Well it sounds like it does NOT have a battery back caching module on
it, am I right?
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Felix Schubert wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> the controller is a HP i410 running 3x300GB SAS 15K / Raid 5
>
> Well it sounds like it does NOT have a battery back caching module on
> it, am I right?
Also what sof
Hi Scott,
the controller is a HP i410 running 3x300GB SAS 15K / Raid 5
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Felix Schubert
Von meinem iPhone gesendet :-)
Am 25.08.2012 um 14:42 schrieb Scott Marlowe :
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Felix Schubert wrote:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> I've got a system on a c
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Felix Schubert wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I've got a system on a customers location which has a XEON E5504 @ 2.00GHz
> Processor (HP Proliant)
>
> It's postgres 8.4 on a Debian Squeeze System running with 8GB of ram:
>
> The Postgres Performance on this system measu
