On Sun, Nov 16, 2014, at 03:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I suspect that the reason the planner likes the backlog_pkey is that it's
> almost perfectly correlated with table order, which greatly reduces the
> number of table fetches that need to happen over the course of a
> indexscan
> compared to using
Yuri Kunde Schlesner writes:
> Does anyone know if there's any tweaking I can do in Postgres so that it
> uses the appropriate plan?
I suspect that the reason the planner likes the backlog_pkey is that it's
almost perfectly correlated with table order, which greatly reduces the
number of table fe
Looks like my client mangled (reflowed) the command outputs, so I
requoted them in this message sent as plain text. In case it happens
again I also posted them to a pastebin here:
https://gist.github.com/yuriks/e86fb0c3cefb8d348c34
--yuriks
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014, at 09:16 PM, Yuri Kunde Schlesner
