Thanks for the advices,
The performance is a bit better now. Unfortunately, the machine does not
allow
to put more than 200 - ~250 users without noticing swap hell.
I have to face the fact that I don't have enough memory
I used the following configuration:
effective_cache_size = 65000
share
Alfranio Correia Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am facing a problem trying to put 500 concurrent users accessing
> a postgresql instance.
I think you're going to need to buy more RAM. 1Gb of RAM means there
is a maximum of 2Mb available per Postgres process before you start
to go into swa
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 04:13:28 +
Alfranio Correia Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> r b w swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs
> us sy id
> 2 29 1 106716 9576 7000 409876 32 154 5888 1262 616 1575
> 8 12 80
On linux I've found as soon as it has t
Alfranio Correia Junior wrote:
Postgresql configuration:
effective_cache_size = 35000
shared_buffers = 5000
random_page_cost = 2
cpu_index_tuple_cost = 0.0005
sort_mem = 10240
Lower sort mem to say 2000-3000, up shared buffers to 10K and up effective cache
size to around 65K. That should make it