Re: [PERFORM] Performance/Maintenance test result collection

2006-05-19 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:20:17AM -0400, Chris Mckenzie wrote: > Yes, regular versus full vacuum. Thanks for the comment but I was hoping to > come to that conclusion on my own by observing the affects of the different > vacuums. > > My original question was guidance on collecting data for confir

Re: [PERFORM] Performance/Maintenance test result collection

2006-05-18 Thread Chris Mckenzie
Title: RE: [PERFORM] Performance/Maintenance test result collection Yes, regular versus full vacuum. Thanks for the comment but I was hoping to come to that conclusion on my own by observing the affects of the different vacuums. My original question was guidance on collecting data for

Re: [PERFORM] Performance/Maintenance test result collection

2006-05-17 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:50:22PM -0400, Chris Mckenzie wrote: > Hi. > > I'm trying to plan for a performance test session where a large database is > subject to regular hits from my application while both regular and full > database maintenance is being performed. The idea is to gain a better id