On 23 Aug 2006 at 22:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Without leaving "enable_hashjoin = false", can you suggest a way to
> > force the index usage?
>
> Have you tried reducing random_page_cost?
Yes. No effect.
> FYI, 8.2 should be a bit better about this.
"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without leaving "enable_hashjoin = false", can you suggest a way to
> force the index usage?
Have you tried reducing random_page_cost?
FYI, 8.2 should be a bit better about this.
regards, tom lane
---(
On 23 Aug 2006 at 13:31, Chris wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > I'm using PostgreSQL 8.1.4 and I'm trying to force the planner to use
> > an index. With the index, I get executions times of 0.5 seconds.
> > Without, it's closer to 2.5 seconds.
> >
> > Compare these two sets of results (also pro
Dan Langille wrote:
I'm using PostgreSQL 8.1.4 and I'm trying to force the planner to use
an index. With the index, I get executions times of 0.5 seconds.
Without, it's closer to 2.5 seconds.
Compare these two sets of results (also provided at
http://rafb.net/paste/results/ywcOZP66.html
sho