Tom,
Thanks for pointing it out. I made the small required modifications to match
copy.c version 1.247 and sent it to -patches list. New patch is V16.
Alon.
On 8/1/05 7:51 PM, "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alon Goldshuv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> This patch appears to reverse
Tom,
>> I've attached it here, sorry to the list owner for the patch inclusion /
>> off-topic.
>
> This patch appears to reverse out the most recent committed changes in
> copy.c.
Which changes do you refer to? I thought I accommodated all the recent
changes (I recall some changes to the tupleta
"Luke Lonergan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/29/05 5:37 AM, "Bruce Momjian" wrote:
>> Where is the most recent version of the COPY patch?
> I've attached it here, sorry to the list owner for the patch inclusion /
> off-topic.
This patch appears to reverse out the most recent committed chan
Bruce,
On 7/29/05 5:37 AM, "Bruce Momjian" wrote:
> Where is the most recent version of the COPY patch?
My direct e-mails aren't getting to you, they are trapped in a spam filter
on your end, so you didn't get my e-mail with the patch!
I've attached it here, sorry to the list owner for the pat
Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 7/28/05 4:43 PM, "Mark Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are there any recommendations for Qlogic controllers on Linux, scsi or
> > fiber channel? I might be able to my hands on some. I have pci-x slots
> > for AMD, Itanium, or POWER5 if the architecture
Mark,
On 7/28/05 4:43 PM, "Mark Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any recommendations for Qlogic controllers on Linux, scsi or
> fiber channel? I might be able to my hands on some. I have pci-x slots
> for AMD, Itanium, or POWER5 if the architecture makes a difference.
I don't have
>>> Can you post the "time dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=8k count=50"
>>> results? Also do the reverse (read the file) with "time dd if=bigfile
>>> of=/dev/null bs=8k".
>
> I didn't see this come across before... here ya go:
>
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=8k count=50
>
> 50+
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /sbin/hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 1816 MB in 2.00 seconds = 908.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 26 MB in 3.11 seconds = 8.36 MB/sec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
Can you post the "time dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=8k count=5000
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:28:43 -0700
"Luke Lonergan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua,
>
> On 7/22/05 10:11 AM, "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The database server is a PE (Power Edge) 6600
> >
> > Database Server IO:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /sbin/hdparm -tT /dev/sda
Mark,
On 7/22/05 12:47 PM, "Mark Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a single spindle:
>
> $ time dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=8k count=200
> 200+0 records in
> 200+0 records out
>
> real2m8.569s
> user0m0.725s
> sys 0m19.633s
This is super fast! 124MB/s seems too f
Joshua,
On 7/22/05 10:11 AM, "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The database server is a PE (Power Edge) 6600
>
> Database Server IO:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /sbin/hdparm -tT /dev/sda
>
> /dev/sda:
> Timing buffer-cache reads: 1888 MB in 2.00 seconds = 944.00 MB/sec
> Ti
On a single spindle:
$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=8k count=200
200+0 records in
200+0 records out
real2m8.569s
user0m0.725s
sys 0m19.633s
None of my drives are partitioned big enough for me to create 2x RAM
sized files on a single disk. I have 16MB RAM and only 3
Here is the SCSI output:
Web Server
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
megaraid: v1.18j (Release Date: Mon Jul 7 14:39:55 EDT 2003)
megaraid: found 0x1028:0x000f:idx 0:bus 4:slot 3:func 0
scsi0 : Found a MegaRAID controller at 0xf883f000, IRQ: 18
scsi0 : Enabling 64 bit support
megaraid: [412
13 matches
Mail list logo
