On 05/26/2011 06:18 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:07 PM, John Rouillard wrote:
Well I am also managing to panic the kernel on some runs as well. So
my guess is this is not only a postgres bug (if it's a postgres issue
at all).
As gregg mentioned in another followup ext4 u
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:07 PM, John Rouillard wrote:
> Well I am also managing to panic the kernel on some runs as well. So
> my guess is this is not only a postgres bug (if it's a postgres issue
> at all).
>
> As gregg mentioned in another followup ext4 under centos 5.x may be an
> issue. I'll
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 03:19:59PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> John Rouillard wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:21:04PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >> John Rouillard wrote:
> >>
> >> > I seem to be able to provoke this error:
> >> >
> >> >vacuum...ERROR: invalid page header in
On 05/23/2011 06:16 PM, John Rouillard wrote:
OS: centos 5.5
Filesystem: data - ext4 (note 4 not 3); 6.6T formatted
wal - ext4; 1.5T formatted
Raid: data - level 10, 8 disk wd2003; controller LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i
wal - level 1, 2 disk wd2003; controller LSI MegaRAID SAS
John Rouillard wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:21:04PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> John Rouillard wrote:
>>
>> > I seem to be able to provoke this error:
>> >
>> >vacuum...ERROR: invalid page header in
>> > block 2128910 of relation base/16385/21476
>>
>> What versi
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:21:04PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> John Rouillard wrote:
>
> > I seem to be able to provoke this error:
> >
> >vacuum...ERROR: invalid page header in
> > block 2128910 of relation base/16385/21476
>
> What version of PostgreSQL?
Hmm, I thought
John Rouillard wrote:
> I seem to be able to provoke this error:
>
>vacuum...ERROR: invalid page header in
> block 2128910 of relation base/16385/21476
What version of PostgreSQL?
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To mak
