On 10/16/07, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only reason I am going down this road is because of the difficulty of
> > using temp tables ( i.e. needing to execute a SQL string). Does anyone know
> > if this requirement may be removed in the near future?
>
> I don't understand
chrisj wrote:
> I am trying to decide between using a temporary table or a stored proc that
> returns a result set to solve a fairly complex problem, and was wondering if
> Postres, when it sees a stored proc reference in a SQL, is smart enough to,
> behind the scenes, create a temporary table with
Hi,
I am trying to decide between using a temporary table or a stored proc that
returns a result set to solve a fairly complex problem, and was wondering if
Postres, when it sees a stored proc reference in a SQL, is smart enough to,
behind the scenes, create a temporary table with the results of
