2010/2/1 :
> * joke 1: insert operation would use a excluse lock on reference row by the
> foreign key . a big big big performance killer , i think this is a stupid
> design .
>
> * joke 2: concurrency update on same row would lead to that other
> transaction must wait the earlier transaction comp
Scott Marlowe wrote:
I wonder if having paid technical support to abuse leads to people
thinking they can treat other people like crap and get the answer they
want anyway...
You have technical support somewhere you get to abuse? For me it always
seems to be the other way around...
--
Greg S
Richard Broersma writes:
> 2010/2/1 :
>> yet, this code is just for fun , why ? because i found this code in one
>> article:PostgreSQL Concurrency Issues .
> I'm not familiar with the "code" that you are referring to. Do you
> have a hyper-link to it?
>> Tom Lane
>> Red Hat Database Group
>> R
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Scott Marlowe escribió:
>> 2010/2/1 :
>
>> Let's rewrite this assertion:
>> > * joke 1: insert operation would use a excluse lock on reference row by the
>> > foreign key . a big big big performance killer , i think this is a stupid
>> > des
Scott Marlowe escribió:
> 2010/2/1 :
> Let's rewrite this assertion:
> > * joke 1: insert operation would use a excluse lock on reference row by the
> > foreign key . a big big big performance killer , i think this is a stupid
> > design .
>
> "problem #1: insert operation would use a excluse lo
2010/2/1 :
> hi, first, thanks u for make so good opensource db .
>
> recently maybe half an years ago ,i begin to use pg in a big project for
> insurance project, belong as the project go on ,and
>
> i found some performance problem on concurrency write situation , then i do
> a research on concu
On Feb 1, 2010, at 8:57 PM, wyx6...@sina.com wrote:
i found a joke ,maybe this joke concurrency strategy is the
designer's pround idea, but i think it is a joke , next let me
describe the problems:
I would suggest that the behavior that you dislike so much is really
not idea of the postg
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, wyx6...@sina.com wrote:
hi, first, thanks u for make so good opensource db .
first you thank the developers, then you insult them. are you asking for
help or just trying to cause problems.
recently maybe half an years ago ,i begin to use pg in a big project for
insuran
hi, first, thanks u for make so good opensource db .
recently maybe half an years ago ,i begin to use pg in a big project for
insurance project, belong as the project go on ,and
i found some performance problem on concurrency write situation , then i do a
research on concurrency write strategy
