On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 07:20:56PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
> for persistant storage you can replicate from your ram-based system to a
> disk-based system, and as long as your replication messages hit disk
> quickly you can allow the disk-based version to lag behind in it's updates
> during your
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, David Lang wrote:
this is getting dangerously close to being able to fit in ram. I saw an
article over the weekend that Samsung is starting to produce 8G DIMM's, that
can go 8 to a controller (instead of 4 per as is currently done), when
motherboards come out that support
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Anjan Dave wrote:
I am not sure if there's an obvious answer to this...If there's a choice
of an external RAID10 (Fiber Channel 6 or 8 15Krpm drives) enabled
drives, what is more beneficial to store on it, the WAL, or the Database
files? One of the other would go on the loca
Hi,
I am not sure if there’s an obvious answer to this…If
there’s a choice of an external RAID10 (Fiber Channel 6 or 8 15Krpm
drives) enabled drives, what is more beneficial to store on it, the WAL, or the
Database files? One of the other would go on the local RAID10 (4 drives,
15Krpm)
