ph...@apra.asso.fr wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>> If you can help (either benchmark work or C coding), try reviving the
>> features by testing them and merging them with the current tree.
> OK, that's the rule of the game in such a community.
> I am not a good C writer, but I will see what I could do.
The F
Hi Jeff,
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The current discussion about "Indexes on low cardinality columns" let
>> me discover this
>> "grouped index tuples" patch (http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/)
>> and its associated
>> "maintain cluster order" patch
>> (http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/maintain
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 21:32 +0200, ph...@apra.asso.fr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The current discussion about "Indexes on low cardinality columns" let
> me discover this
> "grouped index tuples" patch (http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/)
> and its associated
> "maintain cluster order" patch
> (htt
Hi all,
The current discussion about "Indexes on low cardinality columns" let me
discover this
"grouped index tuples" patch (http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/) and its
associated
"maintain cluster order" patch
(http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/maintain_cluster_order_v5.patch)
This
