On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Does Solaris have Posix semaphores? You could try using those instead.
>
> regards, tom lane
Yep. It does.
I learned them quick enough (using posix_sema.c as a guide)
and found out that at least on Sol 2.6 they are slower than sysv -
Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've started profiling and running tests... currently it is leaning
> towards the sysv semaphores. I see in src/backend/port/ that pg_sema.c is
> linked to the sysv implementation.
Does Solaris have Posix semaphores? You could try using those instead.
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> There's plenty of academic work which purports to show that LRU is
> far from the best choice. Just in principle, it seems obvious that a
> single-case seqscan-type operation (such as vacuum does) is a good
> way to lose your cache for no real gain.
>
