On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 06:51:26 +0100, Alex Goncharov
wrote:
,--- You/Divakar (Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:17:22 -0800 (PST)) *
| So it means there will be visible impact if the nature of DB
interaction is DB
| insert/select. We do that mostly in my app.
You can't say a "visible impact" unless you
t; Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 11:21:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] libpq vs ODBC
>
> ,--- You/Divakar (Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:17:22 -0800 (PST)) *
> | So it means there will be visible impact if the nature of DB interaction
> is DB
> | insert/select. We do that mostly in my a
.
Best Regards,
Divakar
From: Alex Goncharov
To: Divakar Singh
Cc: alex-goncha...@comcast.net; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 11:21:26 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] libpq vs ODBC
,--- You/Divakar (Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:17:22 -0800 (PST
,--- You/Divakar (Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:17:22 -0800 (PST)) *
| So it means there will be visible impact if the nature of DB interaction is
DB
| insert/select. We do that mostly in my app.
You can't say a "visible impact" unless you can measure it in your
specific application.
Let's say ODBC ta
handling.
Am I right?
Best Regards,
Divakar
From: Alex Goncharov
To: Divakar Singh
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 10:31:17 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] libpq vs ODBC
,--- You/Divakar (Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:31:30 -0800 (PST
,--- You/Divakar (Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:31:30 -0800 (PST)) *
| Is there any performance penalty when I use ODBC library vs using libpq?
In general, yes.
In degenerate cases when most of the work happens in the server, no.
You need to measure in the contents of your specific application.
-- Ale
Is there any performance penalty when I use ODBC library vs using libpq?
Best Regards,
Divakar
