> Was that 15% before or after updating from CVS?
>
> The more I think about the looping aspect the less I like it, so I'd
> prefer not to pursue making the unlock change for real. But if it's
> really a 15% win then maybe we need to...
>
> regards, tom lane
After. So far
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Does it help if you change FlushBuffer to release buffer lock while
>> flushing xlog?
> Putting your change in resulted in about a 15% increase in insert
> performance. There may be some quirky things going on here with NTFS...
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am batch inserting insert statements into a database with fsync =
on.
> > My single disk system is on a 10k drive...even though I am inside a
> > transaction there is at least 1 file sync per row insert.
>
> Are you certain you'
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am batch inserting insert statements into a database with fsync = on.
> My single disk system is on a 10k drive...even though I am inside a
> transaction there is at least 1 file sync per row insert.
Are you certain you're inside a transaction?
T
> As I understand it, sync() is never called anymore. mdsync() hits the
> all the files 1 by 1 with an fsync. My understanding of the commit
> process is that 30 tps is quite reasonable for my hardware.
Sorry. I didn't see the version in the subject and assumed 7.4 on a
Linux machine with exce
Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 14:40, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > I am batch inserting insert statements into a database with fsync =
on.
> > My single disk system is on a 10k drive...even though I am inside a
> > transaction there is at least 1 file sync per row insert.
>
> Which filesys
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 14:40, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I am batch inserting insert statements into a database with fsync = on.
> My single disk system is on a 10k drive...even though I am inside a
> transaction there is at least 1 file sync per row insert.
Which filesystem?
PostgreSQL isn't issui
I am batch inserting insert statements into a database with fsync = on.
My single disk system is on a 10k drive...even though I am inside a
transaction there is at least 1 file sync per row insert.
Is this normal? On my hardware, which is pretty quick, I am limited to
about 50 inserts/sec. If