On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:58:55PM -0600, Michael Best wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
> >>WITH ANY OF THIS QUERIES MSSQL TAKES NOT MUCH OF 7 SECONDS
> >
> >
> >In which case they make a bad choice for showing PostgreSQL is faster
> >than MSSQL. Is this the only query you have, or are others gi
Richard Huxton wrote:
WITH ANY OF THIS QUERIES MSSQL TAKES NOT MUCH OF 7 SECONDS
In which case they make a bad choice for showing PostgreSQL is faster
than MSSQL. Is this the only query you have, or are others giving you
problems too?
I think count(*) is about the weakest point in PG,
Sidar López Cruz wrote:
Is there something that tells postgres to take the resorces from
computer (RAM, HDD, SWAP on linux) as it need, not modifying variables
on postgresql.conf and other operating system things?
Ah, and how is it to know what to share with other processes?
A days ago i am t
Is there something that tells postgres to take the resorces from computer
(RAM, HDD, SWAP on linux) as it need, not modifying variables on
postgresql.conf and other operating system things?
A days ago i am trying to show that postgres is better than mssql but when
execute a simple query like:
