Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Ron St-Pierre wrote:
>
>> Joe Uhl wrote:
>>
>>> I realize there are people who discourage looking at Dell, but i've been
>>> very happy with a larger ball of equipment we ordered recently from
>>> them. Our database servers consist of a PowerEdge 2950 connected to
Ron St-Pierre wrote:
> Joe Uhl wrote:
>> I realize there are people who discourage looking at Dell, but i've been
>> very happy with a larger ball of equipment we ordered recently from
>> them. Our database servers consist of a PowerEdge 2950 connected to a
>> PowerVault MD1000 with a 1 meter SAS
Ron St-Pierre wrote:
Joe Uhl wrote:
I realize there are people who discourage looking at Dell, but i've been
very happy with a larger ball of equipment we ordered recently from
them. Our database servers consist of a PowerEdge 2950 connected to a
PowerVault MD1000 with a 1 meter SAS cable.
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:54:51 -0400
Joe Uhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realize there are people who discourage looking at Dell, but i've
> been very happy with a larger ball of equipment we ordered recently
> from them. Our database servers consist of a PowerEdge 2950
> connected to a PowerVau
Joe Uhl wrote:
I realize there are people who discourage looking at Dell, but i've been
very happy with a larger ball of equipment we ordered recently from
them. Our database servers consist of a PowerEdge 2950 connected to a
PowerVault MD1000 with a 1 meter SAS cable.
We have a similar piec
I realize there are people who discourage looking at Dell, but i've been
very happy with a larger ball of equipment we ordered recently from
them. Our database servers consist of a PowerEdge 2950 connected to a
PowerVault MD1000 with a 1 meter SAS cable.
The 2950 tops out at dual quad core cpus,
It would probably help you to spend some time browsing the archives of
this list for questions similar to yours - you'll find quite a lot of
consistent answers. In general, you'll find that:
- If you can fit your entire database into memory, you'll get the best
performance.
- If you cannot (
On 10/31/07, Ketema Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to build a very Robust DB server that will support 1000+
> concurrent users (all ready have seen max of 237 no pooling being
> used). i have read so many articles now that I am just saturated. I
> have a general idea but would li
I am trying to build a very Robust DB server that will support 1000+
concurrent users (all ready have seen max of 237 no pooling being
used). i have read so many articles now that I am just saturated. I
have a general idea but would like feedback from others.
I understand query tuning and
