On Jul 23, 7:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul van den Bogaard)
wrote:
> the manual somewhere states "... if archiving is enabled..." To me
> this implies that archiving can be disabled. However I cannot find
> the parameter to use to get this result. Or should I enable archiving
> and use a backup sc
Alvaro,
thanks for the quick reply. Just to make sure: I do not set this
command. This results in the database cycling through a finite set
(hopefully small) set of WAL files. So old WAL files are reused once
the engine thinks this can be done.
Thanks
Paul
On 23-jul-2007, at 19:34, Alva
Perhaps you should've read the configuration-manual-page more carefully. ;)
Besides, WAL-archiving is turned off by default, so if you see them
being archived you actually enabled it earlier
The "archive_command" is empty by default: "If this is an empty string
(the default), WAL archiving is
am Mon, dem 23.07.2007, um 19:24:48 +0200 mailte Paul van den Bogaard
folgendes:
> the manual somewhere states "... if archiving is enabled..." To me
Please don't hijack other threads...
(don't edit a mail-subject to create a new thread. Create a NEW mail!)
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Ko
Paul van den Bogaard wrote:
> the manual somewhere states "... if archiving is enabled..." To me this
> implies that archiving can be disabled. However I cannot find the parameter
> to use to get this result.
Archiving is disabled by not setting archive_command.
--
Alvaro Herrera
the manual somewhere states "... if archiving is enabled..." To me
this implies that archiving can be disabled. However I cannot find
the parameter to use to get this result. Or should I enable archiving
and use a backup script like
#!/usr/bin/bash
exit 0
Would appreciate a hint. And yes
