On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Dave Crooke wrote:
For any database, anywhere, the answer is pretty much always RAID-10.
The only time you would do anything else is for odd special cases.
there are two situations where you would opt for something other than
RAID-10
1. if you need the space that raid
For any database, anywhere, the answer is pretty much always RAID-10.
The only time you would do anything else is for odd special cases.
Cheers
Dave
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 2:12 PM, sergey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got a disk array appliance of 8 disks 1T each (UltraStor RS8IP4). It will
> be used
sergey wrote:
I got a disk array appliance of 8 disks 1T each (UltraStor RS8IP4). It
will be used solely by PostgresQL database and I am trying to choose
the best RAID level for it.
..
Space is the least important factor. Even 1T will be enough.
Use RAID10, measure the speed of the whole arra
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sergey wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I got a disk array appliance of 8 disks 1T each (UltraStor RS8IP4). It will
>> be used solely by PostgresQL database and I am trying to choose the best
>> RAID level for it.
>>
>
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sergey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got a disk array appliance of 8 disks 1T each (UltraStor RS8IP4). It will
> be used solely by PostgresQL database and I am trying to choose the best
> RAID level for it.
>
> The most priority is for read performance since we operate lar
Hello,
I got a disk array appliance of 8 disks 1T each (UltraStor RS8IP4). It will
be used solely by PostgresQL database and I am trying to choose the best
RAID level for it.
The most priority is for read performance since we operate large data sets
(tables, indexes) and we do lots of searches/sc
