On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 21:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It seems like we'll want to do it somehow. Perhaps the cleanest way is
> >> to incorporate toast-table settings in the reloptions of the parent
> >> table. Otherwise dump/relo
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems like we'll want to do it somehow. Perhaps the cleanest way is
>> to incorporate toast-table settings in the reloptions of the parent
>> table. Otherwise dump/reload is gonna be a mess.
> My question is whether there is inte
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Does anyone see a need for having TOAST tables be individually
> > configurable for autovacuum? I've finally come around to looking at
> > being able to use ALTER TABLE for autovacuum settings, and I'm wondering
> > if we need to sup
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone see a need for having TOAST tables be individually
> configurable for autovacuum? I've finally come around to looking at
> being able to use ALTER TABLE for autovacuum settings, and I'm wondering
> if we need to support that case.
It seems
Hackers and PG users,
Does anyone see a need for having TOAST tables be individually
configurable for autovacuum? I've finally come around to looking at
being able to use ALTER TABLE for autovacuum settings, and I'm wondering
if we need to support that case.
--
Alvaro Herrera
