Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> Guys, current tsearch2 should works with millions of documents.
...
> Search itself is incredibly fast !
Oh, I know - you and Teodor have done a wonderful job.
Regards, Dave.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you check
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Dave Page wrote:
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:33:47PM +, Dave Page wrote:
When we outgrow PostgreSQL & Tsearch2, then, well, we'll need to stop
pretending to be Google...
Just for the record: Google has been known to sponsor sites in need wi
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:33:47PM +, Dave Page wrote:
>> When we outgrow PostgreSQL & Tsearch2, then, well, we'll need to stop
>> pretending to be Google...
>
> Just for the record: Google has been known to sponsor sites in need with
> Google Minis and such earli
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:33:47PM +, Dave Page wrote:
> When we outgrow PostgreSQL & Tsearch2, then, well, we'll need to stop
> pretending to be Google...
Just for the record: Google has been known to sponsor sites in need with
Google Minis and such earlier -- I don't know what their[1] polic
Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>
>>> Just as a datapoint, we did try to use mnogosearch for the
>>> postgresql.org website+archives search, and it fell over completely.
>>> Indexing took way too long, and we had search times several t
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:36:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Dave Page wrote:
>
> >Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>
> >>Just as a datapoint, we did try to use mnogosearch for the
> >>postgresql.org website+archives search, and it fell over completely.
> >>Indexing took way
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Dave Page wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Just as a datapoint, we did try to use mnogosearch for the
postgresql.org website+archives search, and it fell over completely.
Indexing took way too long, and we had search times several thousand
times longer than with tsearch2.
Th
Madison Kelly wrote:
Hi all,
I am asking in this list because, at the end of the day, this is a
performance question.
I am looking at writing a search engine of sorts for my database. I
have only ever written very simple search engines before which amounted
to not much more that the que
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> Just as a datapoint, we did try to use mnogosearch for the
> postgresql.org website+archives search, and it fell over completely.
> Indexing took way too long, and we had search times several thousand
> times longer than with tsearch2.
>
> That said, I'm sure there are
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:24:12PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Madison Kelly wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'd really like to come up with a more intelligent search engine that
> >doesn't take two minutes to return results. :) I know, in the end good
> >indexes and underl
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Madison Kelly wrote:
Hi all,
I'd really like to come up with a more intelligent search engine that doesn't
take two minutes to return results. :) I know, in the end good indexes and
underlying hardware will be important, but a sane as possible query structure
helps to st
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 11:29 -0500, Madison Kelly wrote:
>I am looking at writing a search engine of sorts for my database. I
> have only ever written very simple search engines before which amounted
> to not much more that the query string being used with ILIKE on a pile
> of columns. This w
>
> Now see, this is exactly the kind of sagely advice I was hoping for! :)
>
> I'll look into tsearch2, and failing that for some reason, I love the
> keyword table idea.
For example keyword search code, you can try this package:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cascade/cascade-devel-pieces-1.1
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Madison Kelly wrote:
I think the more direct question I was trying to get at is "How do you
build a 'relavence' search engine? One where results are returned/sorted
by relevance of some sort?". At this point, the best I can think of,
would be to perform multiple queries; f
Madison Kelly wrote:
>
> I think the more direct question I was trying to get at is "How do you
> build a 'relavence' search engine? One where results are returned/sorted
> by relevance of some sort?". At this point, the best I can think of,
> would be to perform multiple queries; first matching
> Joshua, I've been digging around the CVS (web) looking for the search
> engine code but so far have only found the reference (www.search) in
> 'general.php' but can't locate the file. You wouldn't happen to have a
> direct link would you?
It's all in module "portal". You will find the indexing
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Madison Kelly wrote:
Hi all,
I am asking in this list because, at the end of the day, this is a
performance question.
I am looking at writing a search engine of sorts for my database. I
have only ever written very simple search engines before wh
>>> So I am hoping some of you guys and gals might be able to point me
>>> towards some resources or offer some tips or gotcha's before I get
>>> started on this. I'd really like to come up with a more intelligent
>>> search engine that doesn't take two minutes to return results. :) I
>>> know,
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Madison Kelly wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am asking in this list because, at the end of the day, this is a
>> performance question.
>>
>> I am looking at writing a search engine of sorts for my database. I
>> have only ever written very simple search engines before which
Madison Kelly wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am asking in this list because, at the end of the day, this is a
> performance question.
>
> I am looking at writing a search engine of sorts for my database. I
> have only ever written very simple search engines before which amounted
> to not much more th
Hi all,
I am asking in this list because, at the end of the day, this is a
performance question.
I am looking at writing a search engine of sorts for my database. I
have only ever written very simple search engines before which amounted
to not much more that the query string being used w
21 matches
Mail list logo
