Re: [PERFORM] VACUUM problems with 7.4

2003-11-24 Thread Neil Conway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But it was not this bad in 7.3 as far as i understand. No, I believe this behavior is present in any recent release of PostgreSQL. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send a

Re: [PERFORM] VACUUM problems with 7.4

2003-11-24 Thread mallah
> Rajesh Kumar Mallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I am sure there is no transaction open with the table banner_stats2. Still VACUUM >> FULL does >> not seems to effective in removing the >> dead rows. > > That is not the issue --- the limiting factor is what is your oldest open > transaction,

Re: [PERFORM] VACUUM problems with 7.4

2003-11-24 Thread Tom Lane
Rajesh Kumar Mallah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am sure there is no transaction open with the table banner_stats2. > Still VACUUM FULL does not seems to effective in removing the > dead rows. That is not the issue --- the limiting factor is what is your oldest open transaction, period. Wheth

[PERFORM] VACUUM problems with 7.4

2003-11-24 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
I am sure there is no transaction open with the table banner_stats2. Still VACUUM FULL does not seems to effective in removing the dead rows. Can any one please help? Regds mallah tradein_clients=# VACUUM FULL verbose banner_stats2 ; INFO: vacuuming "public.banner_stats2" INFO: "banner_stats