Chris wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Harris) writes:
> > On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:02 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> >
> >> I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the
> >> extremely low
> >> price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
> >
> > Replying before my other post came thro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Harris) writes:
> On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:02 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
>> I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the
>> extremely low
>> price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
>
> Replying before my other post came through.. It looks like their
> b
There was a discussion about this about 2 months ago. See the archives.
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:02:26PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the extremely low
> price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
>
> http://www.tomshardware.co
On Oct 3, 2005, at 7:02 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Anybody know a good reason why you can't put a WAL on this, and
enjoy a hefty
speed boost for a fraction of the price of a traditional SSD? (Yes,
it's
SATA, not PCI, so the throughput is not all that impressive -- but
still,
it's got
L PROTECTED]>
Sent: Oct 3, 2005 1:21 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Ultra-cheap NVRAM device
On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:02 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the
> extremely low
> price ($15
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 11:15 -0600, Dan Harris wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:02 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> > I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the
> > extremely low
> > price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
> >
> >
> >
>
> This has been posted before, and th
On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:02 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the
extremely low
price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
Replying before my other post came through.. It looks like their
benchmarks are markedly improved since the last
On Oct 3, 2005, at 5:02 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the
extremely low
price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
This has been posted before, and the main reason nobody got very
excited is that:
a) it only uses the PCI bus
I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the extremely low
price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
http://www.tomshardware.com/storage/20050907/index.html
Anybody know a good reason why you can't put a WAL on this, and enjoy a hefty
speed boost for a fraction of the price of
