On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:29 am, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> I gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance, skrev Shridhar Daithankar:
> > On Wednesday 11 Aug 2004 7:59 pm, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> > > The "common" solution, I guess would be to store them in the filesystem
> > > instead, but I like to have them just
I gmane.comp.db.postgresql.performance, skrev Shridhar Daithankar:
> On Wednesday 11 Aug 2004 7:59 pm, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> > The "common" solution, I guess would be to store them in the filesystem
> > instead, but I like to have them just in the database it is nice clean
> > database and applica
Jesper Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like some advise on storing binary data in the database.
> Currently I have about 300.000 320.000 Bytes "Bytea" records in the
> database. It works quite well but I have a feeling that it actually is
> slowing the database down on queries only relate
On Wednesday 11 Aug 2004 7:59 pm, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> The "common" solution, I guess would be to store them in the filesystem
> instead, but I like to have them just in the database it is nice clean
> database and application design and if I can get PostgreSQL to "not
> cache" them then it should
Hi.
Please be a bit patient.. I'm quite new to PostgreSQL.
I'd like some advise on storing binary data in the database.
Currently I have about 300.000 320.000 Bytes "Bytea" records in the
database. It works quite well but I have a feeling that it actually is
slowing the database down on queri
