On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
(https://secure.dnuk.com/systems/r325hs-1u.php?configuration=7766)
4 x 147GB 15000 rpm SCSI in RAID 10 with 320-1 RAID CARD + 64MB cache BBU
That's running the LSI Megaraid SCSI controller. Those are solid but not
the best performers in thei
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
4 x 147GB 15000 rpm SCSI in RAID 10 with 320-1 RAID CARD + 64MB cache
BBU
In my experience, battery backed cache is always worth the money. Even if
you're mostly select, you will have some updates.
Matthew wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
4 x 147GB 15000 rpm SCSI in RAID 10 with 320-1 RAID CARD + 64MB
cache BBU
2x Intel Xeon E5405 / 4x 2.00GHz / 1333MHz FSB / 12MB cache
6GB RAM
Cost around 2320 GBP -- it would be great to get it under 2000
Needs to be
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
4 x 147GB 15000 rpm SCSI in RAID 10 with 320-1 RAID CARD + 64MB cache BBU
2x Intel Xeon E5405 / 4x 2.00GHz / 1333MHz FSB / 12MB cache
6GB RAM
Cost around 2320 GBP -- it would be great to get it under 2000
Needs to be in the UK.
I
We have a web application for which we intend to run the database on a
dedicated server.
We hope by the end of 2008 to have 10 companies accessing 10 instances
of the database for this application. The dump file of each database is
likely to be less than 100MB at the end of the year. The databases
