"Adam Palmblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've got a C function that we use here and we find that for every
> connection, the first run of the function is much slower than any
> subsequent runs. ( 50ms compared to 8ms)
Perhaps that represents the time needed to load the dynamic library
into t
Adam Palmblad wrote:
Hi,
We've got a C function that we use here and we find that for every
connection, the first run of the function is much slower than any
subsequent runs. ( 50ms compared to 8ms)
That is fairly standard because the data will be cached.
Besides using connection pooling,
Hi,
We've got a C function that we use here and we find that for every
connection, the first run of the function is much slower than any
subsequent runs. ( 50ms compared to 8ms)
Besides using connection pooling, are there any options to improve
performance?
By the way, we are using pg version
