On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:26:06 +0400, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
First off, posting to two lists like you did (-general and -performance)
is frowned on here. Pick whichever is more appropriate for the topic
and post to just that one; in your case, the performance list would be
m
First off, posting to two lists like you did (-general and -performance)
is frowned on here. Pick whichever is more appropriate for the topic and
post to just that one; in your case, the performance list would be more
appropriate, and I'm only replying to there.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Max Zorlo
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:21:43 +0400, Adam Tauno Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a postgres 8.0 and ~400mb database with lots of simple selects
using indexes.
I've installed pgpool on the system. I've set num_init_children to 5 and
here is the top output.
One of postmasters is my demo
> I have a postgres 8.0 and ~400mb database with lots of simple selects
> using indexes.
> I've installed pgpool on the system. I've set num_init_children to 5 and
> here is the top output.
> One of postmasters is my demon running some insert/update tasks. I see
> that they all use cpu heavil
Hello.
I have a postgres 8.0 and ~400mb database with lots of simple selects
using indexes.
I've installed pgpool on the system. I've set num_init_children to 5 and
here is the top output.
One of postmasters is my demon running some insert/update tasks. I see
that they all use cpu heavily,
