Re: [PERFORM] Re[2]: [PERFORM] pgtune + configurations with 9.3

2014-11-16 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 15 November 2014 02:10, Alexey Vasiliev wrote: > Ok. Just need to know what think another developers about this - should > pgtune care about this case? Because I am not sure, what users with 512GB > will use pgtune. pgtune should certainly care about working with large amounts of RAM. Best

[PERFORM] Re[2]: [PERFORM] pgtune + configurations with 9.3

2014-11-14 Thread Alexey Vasiliev
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:06:54 + от Shaun Thomas : > Alexey, > > The issue is not that 8GB is the maximum. You *can* set it higher. What I'm > saying, and I'm not alone in this, is that setting it higher can actually > decrease performance for various reasons. Setting it to 25% of memory on a

[PERFORM] Re[2]: [PERFORM] pgtune + configurations with 9.3

2014-11-14 Thread Alexey Vasiliev
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:13:20 + от Shaun Thomas : >> Yeah, pgTune is pretty badly out of date. It's been on my TODO list, as >> I'm sure it has been on Greg's. > >Yeah. And unfortunately the recommendations it gives have been spreading. Take >a look at the online version: > >http://pgtune.leopard