Re: [PERFORM] Query on Postgresql performance

2003-09-04 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:32:42PM -0700, Naveen Palavalli wrote: > My server spawns a new connection to Postgresql foreach client. My I don't think you want to do that. You should use a pool. Back end startup is mighty expensive. > 1) Effects related to Vaccum :- I performed 10 trials of addin

Re: [PERFORM] Query on Postgresql performance

2003-09-03 Thread Neil Conway
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 15:32, Naveen Palavalli wrote: > shared_buffers = 200 If you're using a relatively modern machine, this is probably on the low side. > 1) Effects related to Vaccum :- I performed 10 trials of adding and > deleting entries . In each trial , 1 client adds 10,000 entries and

[PERFORM] Query on Postgresql performance

2003-09-03 Thread Naveen Palavalli
Hi ,   I am currently using Postgresql for a Research project . I observed some performance results of Postgresql which I would like to discuss .   I have a server which accepts requests from clients. It spawns a new thread for each client. The clients are trying to add entries  to a relatio