On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:46:56AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> I think it's time to get a new hosting provider.
>
> If they're still running PostgreSQL 7.3.9 (the latest 7.3 is 7.3.14, and
> 8.1.3 is amazingly faster than 7.3.anything...) then they're likely not
> updating other vital components
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 04:45, NbForYou wrote:
> Ok, Everybody keeps saying that Postgresql is free...
>
> So I contacted my webhost and their respons was they have to pay a license
> fee.
>
> But because they use PLESK as a service I think they are refering to a fee
> PLESK charges them
> for th
On 3/10/06, NbForYou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Michael, you sure know your stuff!
>
> Versions:
>
> PostgreSQL 7.3.9-RH running on the webhost.
> PostgreSQL 8.0.3 running on my homeserver.
>
> So the only solution is to ask my webhost to upgrade its postgresql?
> The question is will he do t
Ok, Everybody keeps saying that Postgresql is free...
So I contacted my webhost and their respons was they have to pay a
license fee.
But because they use PLESK as a service I think they are refering to a
fee PLESK charges them
for the use combination PLESK - POSTGRESQL
Probab
ch 10, 2006 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Process Time X200
NbForYou wrote:
Hey Michael, you sure know your stuff!
Versions:
PostgreSQL 7.3.9-RH running on the webhost.
PostgreSQL 8.0.3 running on my homeserver.
So the only solution is to ask my webhost to upgrade its postgresql?
The question i
NbForYou wrote:
Hey Michael, you sure know your stuff!
Versions:
PostgreSQL 7.3.9-RH running on the webhost.
PostgreSQL 8.0.3 running on my homeserver.
So the only solution is to ask my webhost to upgrade its postgresql?
The question is will he do that? After all a license fee is required for
On fös, 2006-03-10 at 10:11 +0100, NbForYou wrote:
> Hey Michael, you sure know your stuff!
>
> Versions:
>
> PostgreSQL 7.3.9-RH running on the webhost.
> PostgreSQL 8.0.3 running on my homeserver.
>
> So the only solution is to ask my webhost to upgrade its postgresql?
> The question is will h
On 10.03.2006, at 10:11 Uhr, NbForYou wrote:
So the only solution is to ask my webhost to upgrade its postgresql?
Seems to be.
The question is will he do that?
You are the customer. If they don't, go to another provider.
After all a license fee is required for
commercial use. And running
c:
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Process Time X200
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:11:44AM +0100, NbForYou wrote:
As you can see the query isn't useful anymore because of the
processtime. Please Also notice that both systems use a different
query plan.
Also on the
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:11:44AM +0100, NbForYou wrote:
> As you can see the query isn't useful anymore because of the
> processtime. Please Also notice that both systems use a different
> query plan.
> Also on the webhost we have a loop of 162409 (403 rows * 403 rows).
> Both systems also use a
Hello,
I could need some help.
I have a Postgresql
database When i do a query on my homeserver the result is given
back fast but when i do the same query on my webhost server the query is useless
because of the processtime (200 times slower
(56366.20 / 281.000 = 200.59) ). My Pc
is ju
11 matches
Mail list logo
