I just got the BigAdmin newsletter from Sun today... interestingly enough it
had a link to an article described as:
> Database Performance with NAS: Optimizing Oracle on NFS
> This paper discusses the operation of relational databases with network
> attached storage (NAS). Management implications
arlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew Rawnsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Andrew Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Postgres over Linux NBD or NFS
> On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|> What exactly are you trying to gain, avoid, or do?
Gain: seperate database storage from processing. This lets me move
clusters from one server to another easily. Just stop the postgres
instance on server A and unmount it's filesystem. Then mount it o
How about iSCSI? This is exactly what it's for - presenting a bunch of
remote SCSI hardware as if it were local.
There are several reference implementations on SourceForge from Intel, Cisco
& others.
I've never tried it myself, but I would if I had the need. And let's face
it there are some v
There are some less expensive baby-SAN options coming out now - Dell
has an
rebranded EMC baby SAN (which of course doesn't work with any other EMC
system...) that starts at about $6000 or so. Just read the announcement
- don't know
anything else. While there have been some reports of undewhelmin
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew
Rawnsley) transmitted:
> On Jun 21, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Andrew Hammond wrote:
>> We're looking for an alternative to fiber-channel disk arrays for mass
>> storage. One of the ideas that we're exploring would involve havi
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 20:46, Andrew Rawnsley wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Andrew Hammond wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > We're looking for an alternative to fiber-channel disk arrays for mass
> > storage. One of the ideas that we're exploring would i
On Jun 21, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Andrew Hammond wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We're looking for an alternative to fiber-channel disk arrays for mass
storage. One of the ideas that we're exploring would involve having the
cluster on an NFS mounted filesystem. Another technology we
Andrew Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're looking for an alternative to fiber-channel disk arrays for mass
> storage. One of the ideas that we're exploring would involve having the
> cluster on an NFS mounted filesystem. Another technology we're looking
> at is the Linux NBD (Network Block
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We're looking for an alternative to fiber-channel disk arrays for mass
storage. One of the ideas that we're exploring would involve having the
cluster on an NFS mounted filesystem. Another technology we're looking
at is the Linux NBD (Network Block Devi
10 matches
Mail list logo
