D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> With the price of GigE adapters I wouldn't consider anything else.
>
> I have a huge database that takes about an hour to copy. The netApp snapshot
> feature is very nice because I can get a "moment in time" image of the
> database. Even though I can't run from the sn
On January 16, 2004 11:53 am, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> --On Monday, January 12, 2004 13:45:45 -0800 Shankar K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > We are considering to use NetApp filer for a highly
> > busy 24*7 postgres database and the reason we chose
> I run a (not very busy) PG cluster on a NetAPP.
> I'd appreciate if anyone could share your experience
> in configuring things on the filer for optimal
> performance or any recomendataion that i should be
> aware of.
Netapps are great things. Just beware that you'll be using NFS, and NFS
drivers on many operating systems have been known to be
--On Monday, January 12, 2004 13:45:45 -0800 Shankar K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi There,
We are considering to use NetApp filer for a highly
busy 24*7 postgres database and the reason we chose
netapp, mostly being the "snapshot" functionality for
backing up database online. The filer would
Hi There,
We are considering to use NetApp filer for a highly
busy 24*7 postgres database and the reason we chose
netapp, mostly being the "snapshot" functionality for
backing up database online. The filer would be mounted
on a rh linux server (7.3), 4g RAM, dual cpu with a
dedicated card for file
