Kari Lavikka wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>> The idea of being able to set the toast threshold per column was
>> discussed during 8.3 development, but no patch was produced IIRC. We
>> might do that in the future. If you're willing to compile from source,
>> you can lo
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The idea of being able to set the toast threshold per column was
discussed during 8.3 development, but no patch was produced IIRC. We
might do that in the future. If you're willing to compile from source,
you can lower TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD.
We ar
Kari Lavikka wrote:
> It would be nice if I could flag a column to be toasted always,
> regardless of it's length.
The idea of being able to set the toast threshold per column was
discussed during 8.3 development, but no patch was produced IIRC. We
might do that in the future. If you're willing to
I didn't see your schema, but couldn't these problems be solved by storing
the article id, owner id, and blog date in a separate table? It seems that
if you don't actually need the content of the blogs, all of those questions
could be answered by querying a very simple table with minimal I/O
Kari Lavikka wrote:
Hello!
Some background info.. We have a blog table that contains about eight
million blog entries. Average length of an entry is 1200 letters.
Because each 8k page can accommodate only a few entries, every query
that involves several entries causes several random seeks to
Hello!
Some background info.. We have a blog table that contains about eight
million blog entries. Average length of an entry is 1200 letters. Because
each 8k page can accommodate only a few entries, every query that involves
several entries causes several random seeks to disk. We are having