Re: [PERFORM] Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS

2011-01-11 Thread Jignesh Shah
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > Mladen Gogala wrote: >> >> Rich wrote: >>> >>> I am wondering why anyone would do that?  Too much overhead and no >>> reliable enough. >> >> Apparently, NetApp  thinks that  it is reliable. They're selling that >> stuff  for years.  I know that O

Re: [PERFORM] Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS

2011-01-03 Thread Greg Smith
Mladen Gogala wrote: Rich wrote: I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no reliable enough. Apparently, NetApp thinks that it is reliable. They're selling that stuff for years. I know that Oracle works with NetApp, they even have their own user mode NFS client dr

Re: [PERFORM] Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS

2010-12-21 Thread Mladen Gogala
Rich wrote: I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no reliable enough. Apparently, NetApp thinks that it is reliable. They're selling that stuff for years. I know that Oracle works with NetApp, they even have their own user mode NFS client driver, I am not sure ab

Re: [PERFORM] Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS

2010-12-21 Thread Rich
I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no reliable enough. On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Mladen Gogala wrote: > I was asked about performance of PostgreSQL on NetApp, the protocol should > be NFSv3. Has anybody tried it? The database in question is a DW type, a > bunc

[PERFORM] Performance of PostgreSQL over NFS

2010-12-21 Thread Mladen Gogala
I was asked about performance of PostgreSQL on NetApp, the protocol should be NFSv3. Has anybody tried it? The database in question is a DW type, a bunch of documents indexed by Sphinx. Does anyone have any information? -- Mladen Gogala Sr. Oracle DBA 1500 Broadway New York, NY 10036 (212)