On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> Mladen Gogala wrote:
>>
>> Rich wrote:
>>>
>>> I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no
>>> reliable enough.
>>
>> Apparently, NetApp thinks that it is reliable. They're selling that
>> stuff for years. I know that O
Mladen Gogala wrote:
Rich wrote:
I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no
reliable enough.
Apparently, NetApp thinks that it is reliable. They're selling that
stuff for years. I know that Oracle works with NetApp, they even
have their own user mode NFS client dr
Rich wrote:
I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no
reliable enough.
Apparently, NetApp thinks that it is reliable. They're selling that
stuff for years. I know that Oracle works with NetApp, they even have
their own user mode NFS client driver, I am not sure ab
I am wondering why anyone would do that? Too much overhead and no reliable
enough.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Mladen Gogala wrote:
> I was asked about performance of PostgreSQL on NetApp, the protocol should
> be NFSv3. Has anybody tried it? The database in question is a DW type, a
> bunc
I was asked about performance of PostgreSQL on NetApp, the protocol
should be NFSv3. Has anybody tried it? The database in question is a DW
type, a bunch of documents indexed by Sphinx. Does anyone have any
information?
--
Mladen Gogala
Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212)