On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> I was just troubleshooting a strange performance issue with pg_trgm
>> (greatest extension over) that ran great in testing but poor in
>> production following a 9.6 in place upgrade fro
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I was just troubleshooting a strange performance issue with pg_trgm
> (greatest extension over) that ran great in testing but poor in
> production following a 9.6 in place upgrade from 9.2. By poor I mean
> 7x slower. Problem was resolved b
Hi Merlin:
Any EXPLAIN on the query affected? size of indexes before and after reindex?
Regards,
Daniel.
> El 1 feb 2017, a las 13:38, Merlin Moncure escribió:
>
> I was just troubleshooting a strange performance issue with pg_trgm
> (greatest extension over) that ran great in testing but po
I was just troubleshooting a strange performance issue with pg_trgm
(greatest extension over) that ran great in testing but poor in
production following a 9.6 in place upgrade from 9.2. By poor I mean
7x slower. Problem was resolved by ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE followed by
a REINDEX on the impacted t