nabble.30.miller_2...@spamgourmet.com writes:
> I've run EXPLAIN on the query, but AFAICS the query plan does not
> appear significantly different than the abridged version for this
> particular query (output attached below).
I think what's happening is that you've got the hashed NOT IN being
push
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Scott Marlowe -
scott.marl...@gmail.com
<+nabble+miller_2555+3b65e832a3.scott.marlowe#gmail@spamgourmet.com>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:52 AM,
> wrote:
> > I can probably fix by making the following sysctl adjustments:
> > vm.overcommit_memory =