Alessandro Baretta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... I would like to receive some
> insight on the implications of such a choice. Beside the fact that the parser
> has more work to do to decipher queries and whatnot, what other parts of the
> server would be stressed by a verbose naming scheme?
Tom Lane wrote:
Alessandro Baretta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am considering the possibility of rebuilding the server with
NAMEDATALEN equal to 256. I have seen an interesting thread [1] about
the performance impact of raising NAMEDATALEN, but it did not seem
conclusive.
More to the point,
Alessandro Baretta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am considering the possibility of rebuilding the server with
> NAMEDATALEN equal to 256. I have seen an interesting thread [1] about
> the performance impact of raising NAMEDATALEN, but it did not seem
> conclusive.
More to the point, tests done o
Gentlemen,
I use a modeling language which compiles down to a fairly verbose SQL DDL. If I
use semantically transparent identifiers in the modeling language, the compiler
easily generates identifiers much longer than the default value of NAMEDATALEN.
I am considering the possibility of rebuildin
