Hi Tom,
do you think it would be a good idea to ask GIN index team to
implement an int-based bitmap set indexing operator for GIN/GiST based
indexes? Or there will be a possibility to somehow optimally index
arrays of enumerations to implement such bitmap structures in 8.3 or
later postgresql vers
Hi,
A little clarification. Actually, TBL1.CATEGORY and/or TBL2.CATEGORY may
hold a binary value having multiple binary(ies) '1'.
Each binary value column represent an business attribute.
If a binary value column is equal to '1', it means that the business
attribute is True,
otherwise it is fals
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 8:37 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:49 AM, in message
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, valgog
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:=20
>>> Are you sure you understood w
"Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:49 AM, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, valgog
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:=20
>> Are you sure you understood what was the question?
>>
>> Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY &
>> TBL2.CATEGORY >
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:49 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, valgog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What about saying?:
>>
>> TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY
>>
>
> Are you sure you understood what was the question?
>
> Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY &
> T
> What about saying?:
>
> TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY
>
Are you sure you understood what was the question?
Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY &
TBL2.CATEGORY > 0?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is
Hi,
I could not find and normal solution for that issue. But I am using
some workarounds for that issue.
The solution, that I am using now is to create an index for every bit
of your bitmap field.
So something like
CREATE INDEX idx_hobbybit_0_limited
ON "versionA".user_fast_index
USING btre
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 7:30 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "W.Alphonse
HAROUNY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>and each binary value of [variableCategory] may only hold a single binary
> '1'.
> TBL1.CATEGORY & TBL2.CATEGORY <> 0 //-- where & is the AND bitwise
> operator
What abou
Hi,
I could not find and normal solution for that issue. But I am using some
workarounds for that issue.
The solution, that I am using now is to create an index for every bit of
your bitmap field.
So something like
CREATE INDEX idx_hobbybit_0_limited
ON "versionA".user_fast_index
USING btre
Hello,
My question is about index usage when bitwise operations are invoked.
Situation Context:
--
Lets suppose we have 2 tables TBL1 and TBL2 as the following:
TBL1 {
. ;
integer categoryGroup; // categoryGroup is declared as an index on TABL1
. ;
}
10 matches
Mail list logo