On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Eliot Gable wrote:
> Not sure if anyone else saw this, but it struck me as an interesting
> idea if it could be added to PostgreSQL. GPU accelerated database
> operations could be very... interesting. Of course, this could be
> difficult to do in a way that usefull
Scott Carey writes:
> On a similar note, is Postgres' Quicksort a dual-pivot quicksort? This can
> be up to 2x as fast as a normal quicksort (25% fewer swap operations, and
> swap operations are more expensive than compares for most sorts).
In Postgres, the swaps are pretty much free compared
On a similar note, is Postgres' Quicksort a dual-pivot quicksort? This can be
up to 2x as fast as a normal quicksort (25% fewer swap operations, and swap
operations are more expensive than compares for most sorts).
Just google 'dual pivot quicksort' for more info.
And before anyone asks --
On 8/30/2010 3:18 PM, Chris Browne wrote:
... As long as you're willing to rewrite PostgreSQL in Occam 2...
Just re-write it in Google's new language 'Go' : it's close enough to
Occam and they'd probably fund the project..
;)
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@
david_l...@boreham.org (David Boreham) writes:
> Feels like I fell through a worm hole in space/time, back to inmos in
> 1987, and a guy from marketing has just
> walked in the office going on about there's a customer who wants to
> use our massively parallel hardware to speed up databases...
...
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 09:51 -0400, Eliot Gable wrote:
> Not sure if anyone else saw this, but it struck me as an interesting
> idea if it could be added to PostgreSQL. GPU accelerated database
> operations could be very... interesting. Of course, this could be
> difficult to do in a way that useful
Feels like I fell through a worm hole in space/time, back to inmos in
1987, and a guy from marketing has just
walked in the office going on about there's a customer who wants to use
our massively parallel hardware to speed up databases...
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-per
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Gaël Le Mignot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In my humble opinion, while it can sound interesting from a theorical
> point of view to outloads some operations to the GPU, there is a huge
> pratical problem in current world : databases which are big enough to
> require suc
Greg Smith wrote:
This comes up every year or so. The ability of GPU offloading to help
with sorting has to overcome the additional latency that comes from
copying everything over to it and then getting all the results back.
If you look at the typical types of sorting people see in PostgreSQL
Well, from that perspective, it becomes a "chicken and egg" problem.
Without the software support to use a GPU in a server for
acceleration, nobody's going to build a server with a GPU.
However, as previously stated, I can understand the challenges with
determining whether the offloading would eve
Not sure if anyone else saw this, but it struck me as an interesting
idea if it could be added to PostgreSQL. GPU accelerated database
operations could be very... interesting. Of course, this could be
difficult to do in a way that usefully increases performance of
PostgreSQL, but I'll leave that up
Hello,
In my humble opinion, while it can sound interesting from a theorical
point of view to outloads some operations to the GPU, there is a huge
pratical problem in current world : databases which are big enough to
require such heavy optimization are usually runned on server hardware,
which v
Eliot Gable wrote:
Not sure if anyone else saw this, but it struck me as an interesting
idea if it could be added to PostgreSQL. GPU accelerated database
operations could be very... interesting. Of course, this could be
difficult to do in a way that usefully increases performance of
PostgreSQL, b
Not sure if anyone else saw this, but it struck me as an interesting
idea if it could be added to PostgreSQL. GPU accelerated database
operations could be very... interesting. Of course, this could be
difficult to do in a way that usefully increases performance of
PostgreSQL, but I'll leave that up
14 matches
Mail list logo