On 03/06/10 02:53, Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Tuesday 01 June 2010, Mark Kirkwood
wrote:
I'm helping set up a Red Hat 5.5 system for Postgres. I was going to
recommend xfs for the filesystem - however it seems that xfs is
supported as a technology preview "layered product" for 5.5. This
apparent
you can try Scientific Linux 5.x,it plus XFS and some other soft for HPC based
on CentOS.
It had XFS for years
--- On Wed, 6/2/10, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> From: Alan Hodgson
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] File system choice for Red Hat systems
> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.o
On Tuesday 01 June 2010, Mark Kirkwood
wrote:
> I'm helping set up a Red Hat 5.5 system for Postgres. I was going to
> recommend xfs for the filesystem - however it seems that xfs is
> supported as a technology preview "layered product" for 5.5. This
> apparently means that the xfs tools are only
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Yeah, RHEL6 seems like the version we would prefer - unfortunately
time frame is the next few days. Awesome - thanks for the quick reply!
The RHEL6 beta is out, I'm running it, and I expect a straightforward
upgrade path to the final release--I think I can just keep grabbi
On 02/06/10 17:17, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
For xfs, you may want to read this:
http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2010/04/the-return-of-xfs-on-linux.html
Thanks - yes RHEL6 is the version we would have liked to use I suspect!
Regards
Mark
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-p
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:06 +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> What are Red Hat using people choosing for a good performing
> filesystem?
ext2 (xlogs) and ext3 (data).
For xfs, you may want to read this:
http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2010/04/the-return-of-xfs-on-linux.html
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜND
On 02/06/10 15:26, Tom Lane wrote:
What's your time horizon? RHEL6 will have full support for xfs.
On RHEL5 I really wouldn't consider anything except ext3.
Yeah, RHEL6 seems like the version we would prefer - unfortunately time
frame is the next few days. Awesome - thanks for the quick r
Mark Kirkwood writes:
> I'm helping set up a Red Hat 5.5 system for Postgres. I was going to
> recommend xfs for the filesystem - however it seems that xfs is
> supported as a technology preview "layered product" for 5.5. This
> apparently means that the xfs tools are only available via special
I'm helping set up a Red Hat 5.5 system for Postgres. I was going to
recommend xfs for the filesystem - however it seems that xfs is
supported as a technology preview "layered product" for 5.5. This
apparently means that the xfs tools are only available via special
channels.
What are Red Hat
