Re: [PERFORM] Dynamically loaded C function performance

2006-05-11 Thread Joe Conway
Jim C. Nasby wrote: On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 03:47:53PM -0700, Adam Palmblad wrote: Hi, We've got a C function that we use here and we find that for every connection, the first run of the function is much slower than any subsequent runs. ( 50ms compared to 8ms) Besides using connection pooling

Re: [PERFORM] Dynamically loaded C function performance

2006-05-11 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 03:47:53PM -0700, Adam Palmblad wrote: > Hi, > We've got a C function that we use here and we find that for every > connection, the first run of the function is much slower than any > subsequent runs. ( 50ms compared to 8ms) > > Besides using connection pooling, are there

[PERFORM] Dynamically loaded C function performance

2006-05-09 Thread Adam Palmblad
Hi, We've got a C function that we use here and we find that for every connection, the first run of the function is much slower than any subsequent runs. ( 50ms compared to 8ms) Besides using connection pooling, are there any options to improve performance? -Adam ---(end