Re: [PERFORM] Drop table vs Delete record

2007-05-23 Thread Chris Mair
Hi, with that setup you should vacuum aggressivley. I'd send a vacuum statement in a third thread every 15 minutes or so. The table renaming trick doesn't sound very handy or even necessary... Bye, Chris. > Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:38:40 -0400 > From: "Orhan Aglagul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > T

Re: [PERFORM] Drop table vs Delete record

2007-05-22 Thread Orhan Aglagul
Checking out right now Thanks for the fast response. -Original Message- From: Andreas Kostyrka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 11:49 AM To: Orhan Aglagul Cc: Subject: AW: [PERFORM] Drop table vs Delete record Consider table partitioning (it's described i

Re: [PERFORM] Drop table vs Delete record

2007-05-22 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
Consider table partitioning (it's described in the manual). Andreas -- Ursprüngl. Mitteil. -- Betreff:[PERFORM] Drop table vs Delete record Von:"Orhan Aglagul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Datum: 22.05.2007 18:42 My application has two threads, one inserts thou

[PERFORM] Drop table vs Delete record

2007-05-22 Thread Orhan Aglagul
My application has two threads, one inserts thousands of records per second into a table (t1) and the other thread periodically deletes expired records (also in thousands) from the same table (expired ones). So, we have one thread adding a row while the other thread is trying to delete a ro