Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-24 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
On 24 Nov 2004 01:52:52 -0500, Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks for those tips. I'll print and keep them. So in my case, the > > product_code being varchar(24) is: > > 4 bytes + string size (so possibly up to 24) = possible 28 bytes

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-24 Thread Greg Stark
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This could hurt if they ever reuse an old previously retired postal code, > > which isn't an entirely impossible case. As far as I know it hasn't happened > > yet though. > > One would suppose that the guys who are

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-23 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This could hurt if they ever reuse an old previously retired postal code, > which isn't an entirely impossible case. As far as I know it hasn't happened > yet though. One would suppose that the guys who are in charge of this point at Canada Post consider th

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-23 Thread Greg Stark
Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for those tips. I'll print and keep them. So in my case, the > product_code being varchar(24) is: > 4 bytes + string size (so possibly up to 24) = possible 28 bytes. I > did the good thing using a serial. For my shorter keys (4 bytes + up > to

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-23 Thread Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
All, Well, you should still escape any strings you're getting from a web page so you can ensure you're not subject to a SQL insert attack, even if you're expecting integers. Thanks, Peter Darley Well, your framework should do this for you : "integer" specified in your database object class

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-23 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:54:56 -0800, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre, > > > What is the common approach? Should I use directly the product_code as > > my ID, or use a sequantial number for speed? (I did the same for the > > company_id, this is a 'serial' and not the shor name of

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-23 Thread Peter Darley
ehalf Of Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key > What is the common approach? Should I use directly the product_code as > my ID, or use a sequantial number for speed? (I did the same

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-23 Thread Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
It would be nice if PostgreSQL had some form of transparent surrogate keying in the background which would automatically run around and replace your real data with SERIAL integers. It could use a lookup table There is still table inheritance, but it's not really the same. -

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-22 Thread Josh Berkus
Rod, > It would be nice if PostgreSQL had some form of transparent surrogate > keying in the background which would automatically run around and > replace your real data with SERIAL integers. It could use a lookup table > for conversions between the surrogate and real values so the user never > kn

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-22 Thread Rod Taylor
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 16:54 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > Alexandre, > > > What is the common approach? Should I use directly the product_code as > > my ID, or use a sequantial number for speed? (I did the same for the > > company_id, this is a 'serial' and not the shor name of the customer. > > I j

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-22 Thread Josh Berkus
Alexandre, > What is the common approach? Should I use directly the product_code as > my ID, or use a sequantial number for speed? (I did the same for the > company_id, this is a 'serial' and not the shor name of the customer. > I just don't know what is usually done. Don't use SERIAL just becaus

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-22 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
Mr Caillaud, Merci! Many points you bring were also my toughts. I was asking myself really this was the way to go. I'm happy to see that my view of the problem was good. Encore merci! (Thanks again!) On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:06:13 +0100, Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > W

Re: [PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-22 Thread Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
What is the common approach? Should I use directly the product_code as my ID, or use a sequantial number for speed? (I did the same for the company_id, this is a 'serial' and not the shor name of the customer. I just don't know what is usually done. Use a serial : - you can change product_code f

[PERFORM] Data type to use for primary key

2004-11-22 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
Good day, I'm asking myself if there is a performance issue in using an integer of varchar(24) PRIMARY KEY in a product table. I've read that there is no speed issue in the query, but that the only performance issue is the database size of copying the key in other tables that require it. My prod